[sshc-mig] Can I Take the Space Plane?
Chris Agocs
camerazn at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 01:15:38 UTC 2016
Sorry, I didn't realize it was that bad. I'd love to see a picture of the
damage.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM Dmitriy Vysotskiy <conspiracyx at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Agocs,
> I got damage beyond the nose gear, including my tail not holding on due to
> previous repairs. I would rather take a new fuselage and attempt to attach
> my wings to it, or build again.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016, 7:58 PM Chris Agocs <camerazn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dmitriy,
>> Pursuant to Dan's response, when I rebuilt my nose, I used some scrap
>> foam to build a double-thickness nose with three pieces of scrap CF rod as
>> reinforcements. Your plane is in excellent shape as-is. If you'd like, I
>> can show you my modifications and cut out the same for you if you'd like. I
>> took a pretty good nose-dive today, and all I did was break a prop.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:13 PM Dmitriy Vysotskiy <conspiracyx at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like Dan's and Phillip's emails went only to me (are you guys
>>> replying correctly?). I shall copy your responses back into the discussion.
>>>
>>> My response to Dan:
>>>
>>> Unless I remember wrong, the Space Plane is just the assembled foam - no
>>> RC parts. If so, I figure I wouldn't be depriving the space/group from a
>>> working plane and it would save me time getting airborne again. In turn I
>>> can pay for the additional material and whenever Dan can print more parts,
>>> I can assemble a new Space Plane. I think I am diligent enough to put
>>> another nice one together. Maybe that's what we can keep doing forward -
>>> have a standby frame ready to go?
>>>
>>> If the Space Plane happened to be fully assembled (or already is, in
>>> case I forgot), then Dan's point stands - a working Space Plane should be
>>> used temporarily and carefully so it can last.
>>>
>>> Dan's previous reply:
>>> My opinions are:
>>> 1. me paying for and building another HTC Flyer for the space or: Dan:
>>> I'd rather the space plane be used to fly temporarily, and if crashed badly
>>> replaced with the a new HTC that is built well and is easy to fly. The
>>> space plane should be flown as carefully as possible with the idea others
>>> can still fly it later and to repect the amount of work someone put into it
>>> to get it flying.
>>> 2. building a different body so that others can test fly it or
>>> something.: Dan: That's a cool idea, but I think that new plane styles
>>> should be an addition to the HTC space plane
>>>
>>> Phill's reply:
>>> I'm cool with you taking the space plane as long as you build another
>>> one to replace it.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sshc-mig mailing list
>>> sshc-mig at groups.sshchicago.org
>>> http://groups.sshchicago.org/listinfo/sshc-mig
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://groups.sshchicago.org/pipermail/sshc-mig/attachments/20160902/ffd5d07c/attachment.html>
More information about the sshc-mig
mailing list